• Sayyida Sayyida Program studi manajemen, FEB,Universitas Wiraraja
  • Alwiyah Alwiyah Program studi Akuntansi, FEB,Universitas Wiraraja
Keywords: Structural Equation Modelling (SEM), research method, economic


Economic phenomenon Area is complicated to be researched. Many researchwhich is difficult to be finished by ordinary analysis. So that in the year 1916, SwallWright introduce analyzer of Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). Until this time SEMis popular among social research of do not aside in economic area. Have many successeconomics research finish economic phenomenon with structure SEM analyse whichcomplicated. Structure in SEM which is complicated oblige all consumer to be more takea care in using it in order not to happened mistake of interpretation particularly againmistake of usage. This article aim to give the understanding of hitting SEM and its growthand also its application specially to researcher in economic area. This article present theunderstanding of hitting SEM started from estimation method, software which can wear,way of activity, weakness and advantage and also various application of SEM ineconomic area specially.


Adedeji, A. N., Sidique, S. F., Rahman,
A. A., & Law, S. H. (2016).
The role of local content
policy in local value creation
in Nigeria’s oil industry: A structural equation modeling (SEM) approach. Resources Policy, 49, 61–73. pol.2016.04.006
Alshetewi, S., & Karim, F. (2015). A
Structural Equation Model (
SEM ) of Governing Factors
Influencing the
Implementation of TGovernment, 6(11), 119–125.
Awang, Z. (2014). A Handbook on SEM
for Academicians ang
practitioners. Selangor: MPWS
Rich Resources.
Budsankom, P., Sawangboon, T., &
Damrongpanit, S. (2015).
Factors affecting higher order
thinking skills of students : A
meta-analytic structural
equation modeling study,
10(19), 2639–2652.
Cheung, M. W.-L., & Chan, W. (2005).
Meta-analytic structural
equation modeling: A twostage approach. Psychological
Methods, 10(1), 40–64.
Decker, W. H., Calo, T. J., Weer, C. H.,
Decker, W. H., Calo, T. J., &
Weer, C. H. (2012). careers
Affiliation motivation and
interest in entrepreneurial
Gärling, T. (1999). Structural Equation
Modeling of Determinants of
Implementation Intentions.
Golob, T. F. (2001). Structural Equation
Modeling for Travel Behavior
Kusurkar, R. A., Vos, C. M. P., Westers,P., & Croiset, G. (2013). Howmotivation affects academicperformance : a structuralequation modelling analysis,57–69.
Nachtigall, C., Kroehne, U., Funke, F.,
& Steyer, R. (2003). ( Why )
Should We Use SEM ? Pros
and Cons of Structural
Equation Modeling, 8(2), 1–
Ramli, A., Akasah, Z. A., & Masirin, M.
I. M. (2014). Safety and Health
Factors Influencing
Performance of Malaysian
Low-cost Housing: Structural
Equation Modeling (SEM)
Approach. Procedia - Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 129,
Sayyida, S. (2014). Harapan, Kepuasan
Dan Keluhan Terhadap
Loyalitas Mahasiswa Di
Universitas Wiraraja Sumenep.
Wacana Equilibrium, 2(1), 1–
Sayyida, S., & Anekawati, A. (2012).
Penggunaan Analisis
Structural Equation Modelling
(SEM) Dalam Mengidentikasi
Pengaruh Variabel Moderasi
Struktur Desentralisasi
Terhadap Hubungan Partispasi
Dalam Penyusunan Anggaran
Dan Kinerja Manajerial SKPD
Di Kabupaten Sumenep.
Prosiding Univeritas Wiraraja,
1(1), 63–75.
Sayyida, S., Hermanto, B., & Sugianto,
E. (2015). Pentingnya Kualitas
Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan
Dan Loyalitas Pengunjung
Perpustakaan Daerah
Kabupaten Sumenep.
Performance: Jurnal Bisnis &
Akuntansi, 5(2), 67–79.
Shah, R., & Goldstein, S. M. (2006).
Use of structural equation
modeling in operations
management research :
Looking back and forward §,
24, 148–169.